🔗 Share this article

Established parties in power are more and more enabling the far right to dictate the public discourse, according to a new study conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics found that this trend has unwittingly helped far-right parties by legitimising their viewpoints and disseminating them more widely.

Analysis Based on Two Decades of News Coverage

The findings, published in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an automated text analysis of over 520,000 news pieces from six German publications.

Berlin-based researchers noted that as the far right shifted from fringe issues in the 1990s era to central subjects like assimilation and immigration, established political groups progressively adapted their messaging in response.

This adaptation boosted the spread of these concepts and signaled to voters that such stances were acceptable.

Consequences for Democracy

"Public discourse by mainstream political groups plays a central role in the voting performance of the radical right," explained a expert in political behavior involved in the study.

"This factor has been overlooked," she added.

The effect was noticeable even when mainstream groups were criticising the far right. "They still receive focus," the researcher remarked. "The main point is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this focus is key."

Normalisation Phenomenon Throughout the Continent

While the research was centered around the German context, this mainstreaming phenomenon is likely to apply to nations throughout the European continent.

"This is frequently observed in European media," said another researcher. "The far right says something and everyone begins discussing it for one week."

"Even if you're countering it, you're repeating it," he stated.

Toughening of Political Rhetoric

At certain points, leaders have also hardened their discourse to align with that of the radical right.

In a recently published interview, a former national leader advocated widespread deportations and pushed for them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Similar examples can be observed throughout the continent, as elected officials from countries including the UK to the French Republic adopt the language of the far right, especially on migration.

This has formed an feedback loop that would have been inconceivable a ten years prior.

Central Issue: Who Sets the Agenda?

"{If you're a moderate party and you are talking about cultural issues – immigration, integration – in a way that is dictated by the pace of the radical right, that's the essence of agenda setting," clarified a study author.

Other parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the strict agenda of the radical right, even as research suggests that doing so leads voters to cast their ballot for the radical faction.

Progressive Influence and Voter Awareness

The extent of information collected showed that the influence of far-right groups had been progressive and had grown with the passage of time.

"Public perception doesn't change from day to day," commented a researcher. "However, when you encounter this negative framing around immigration frequently, and it is being spread not only by far-right parties but also, for example, by established political organizations, then of course this storyline travels further."

Need for Established Parties to Carve Out Their Own Narratives

The study emphasized the need for established parties to develop their distinct discourses, particularly on subjects such as immigration and assimilation, rather than constantly trailing after the far right.

"It resembles a choreography," explained one researcher. "When the leader is radical and you're responding to them, you cannot decide which music should be playing."